Connect with us

Opinion

Strategies for transforming the nation through statistics

Published

on

Strategies for transforming the nation through statistics

Altaf Hussain Haji

As we know that the United Nations (UN) General Assembly held on September 25, 2015 adopted the document titled “Transforming our World with the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development”. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are (1) End poverty (2) Zero hunger (3) Good health and wellbeing (4) Quality education (5) Gender equality (6) Clean Water and Sanitation (7) Affordable and clean energy (8) Decent work and economic growth (9) Industry, innovation and infrastructure (10) Reduced inequalities (11) Sustainable cities and communities (12) Responsible consumption and production (13) Climate change (14) Life below water (15) Life on land (16) Peace, Justice and Strong institutions and (17) Partnerships for the goals.

India has provided strong endorsement to the SDGs, giving a considerable fillip to agenda 2030. It is widely agreed that India will play a leading role in determining the relative success or failure of the SDGs, as it is the second-most populous country in the world. The sustainable development goals is a real agenda to change the world by achieving targets by 2030.

As one person wrote: “It follows that an acceleration in the rate of change will result in an increasing need for reorganisation or restructuring. The reorganisation is usually feared because it means disturbance of the status quo, a threat to people’s vested interests in their jobs, and an upset to established ways of doing things while restructured is somehow to first step to involve in the change which seems to be implementing by sustainable Development goals.

It must be considered that there is nothing difficult to carry out, nor in doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things.

Subsequent SDG agenda have confirmed the importance of the concern about the change in the world. Today, more and more administrators deal with new government regulations, new products, growth, increased competition, technological developments, and a changing workforce by implementing SGDs. In response, most government setup, Centre as well as state governments find that they must undertake moderate organizational changes. The same has happened in the Union Ministry of Statistics and Programme implementation, government of India recently issued an order to streamline and strengthen with respect to the Indian official statistics system and to bring in more synergy by integrating its administrative function within the ministry setup. The National Statistical Office (NSO) is the result of the change by existing CSO and NSSO.  The name of CSO and NSSO skip for the smooth functioning of the statistical system in India. No doubt this change misunderstanding the public and lack of trust happened among peoples. There is a need for strategies to handle the situation for new renames and fame of the National Statistics Office (NSO).

As we see in the field of collection of data of various socio-economic surveys of NSO that overall population also want to change even they do not understand its implications and perceive that it might with a good cost.

On the other hand, a few organisations can be characterised as having a high level of trust between citizens, employees and managers or administrators that easily for misunderstandings to develop when change is introduced. Unless managers or administrators surface the misunderstandings and clarify them rapidly, they can lead to resistance to easily catch change initiators by surprise. It has found that many managers have quite strong feelings about participation—sometimes positive and sometimes negative. That is, some managers or administrators feel, that there should always be participation during change efforts, while others feel this is virtually always a mistake. Both attitudes can create problems for a manager or administrator which results hampered the new way of working in the setup.

When change initiators believe they do not have all the information they need to design and implement a change, or when they need the wholehearted commitment of others to do so, involving others makes very good sense. Considerable research has demonstrated that, in general, participation leads to commitment, not merely compliance.    In some instances, commitment is needed for the change to be a success. Nevertheless, the participation process does have its drawbacks. Not only can it lead to a poor solution if the process is not carefully managed, but also it can be enormously time-consuming. When the change must be made immediately, it can take simply too long to involve others.

In approaching an organizational or any other change situation, managers explicitly or implicitly make strategic choices regarding the speed of the effort, the amount of preplanning, the involvement of others, and the relative emphasis they will give to different approaches. Successful change efforts seem to be those where these choices are internally consistent and fit some key situational variables.

The strategic options available to managers can be usefully thought of as existing on a continuum. At one end of the continuum, the change strategy calls for very rapid implementation, a clear plan of action, and little involvement of others. This type of strategy mows over any resistance and, at the extreme, would result in a fait accompli. At the other end of the continuum, the strategy would call for a much slower change process, a less clear plan, and involvement on the part of many people other than the change initiators.

As we know that the government of India is strongly committed to agenda 2030 including the full swing of Sustainable Development Goals. India is already taking significant strides towards the attainment of SDGs, India’s National Development Agenda outlines the measures of the government by taking issues like poverty, sustainable growth, health, nutrition, gender equality and quality education among several others.  Here the statistics play an important role to know the issues. This is another strategy to know the situation. The question is here the issue that arises during the implementation of sustainable development goals. Maybe these issues are linked with sustainable development goals and targets with National statistical indicators but fail to report achievement. There are so many indicators that determine where the goals stand for and what steps or strategies should be taken to achieve targets of the prescribed goals. Further, there are so many indicators that have no statistics which results in the weakness of the targets to implement and will not able to achieve the goals well in the time frame year 2030. The government was already given the responsibility to the Union Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) in developing the National Indicator Framework (NIF) which will help in monitoring the progress of the SDGs and associated targets. Statistical indicators of National Indicator Frameworks (NIF) will be the backbone of monitoring of SDGs at the national and state level and will scientifically measure the outcomes of the policies to achieve the targets under different SDGs. The National Statistical Office (NSO) of ministry is the nodal agency for planning and facilitating the integrated development of the statistical system in the country, and to lay down norms & standards in the field of official statistics, evolving concepts, definitions, classification and methodologies of data collection, processing, and release of results etc.

The following some brief strategies may be taken into consideration to transferring the world by implementing Sustainable Development goals

  • It should be first and foremost to make available data or statistics to planners and policymakers of every indicator
  • Try to reduce time-lag in the dissemination of data or statistics so that better and timely result will available for better implementation of SDGs
  • Improving the quality of data or statistics so that targets of SDGs will be achieved in the time frame by 2030.
  • Taking-up new data sets in the emerging areas to cover every indicator of SGDs so that those can meet the aspirations of stakeholders
  • The coordination with central and state statistical organizations may improve to maintain the quality of indicator and get better quality data from stakeholders

Further developing appropriate strategies to create awareness about the importance of data as well as to improve “visibility” to enhance the image of both the statistical personnel and the statistical Organizations

A policy on developing new data sets should be evolved. It should include the need for the generation of new data sets, irrespective of whether it will be done by NSO or other Departments of other ministries.

Altaf Hussain Haji, ISS, is Deputy Director General National Statistical Office, Shimla. He can be contacted at altafhh@rediffmail.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AgriBiz

Blossom at Risk | Climate Change and Its Impact on Floriculture

Published

on

Blossom at Risk

Dr Zahoor Ahmed Rather

Prof Imtiyaz Tahir Nazki

Blossom at Risk

The global environmental agencies declared 2024 the hottest year and over the course of the last century, the average surface temperature of earth has increased, amounting to around 0.74 0C.As per the Economic Survey, India is the seventh most vulnerable country to climate change and faced severe weather extremes, with 93% of days in 2024 marked by extreme climate events such as heatwaves, cyclones, and floods. As the world grapples with the phenomenon of climate change, one of the most visually striking yet often overlooked casualties is the floriculture industry. From tulips in the Netherlands to roses in Kenya, the delicate balance required for flower cultivation is being disrupted by rising temperatures, erratic weather patterns, and shifting ecosystems. The floriculture industry employs millions of people, from small-scale farmers in developing countries to large-scale exporters in Europe and Asia. The decline in flower quality and quantity due to climate change could have far-reaching consequences not only affecting global flower supplies but also small-scale flower growers, being the backbone of this industry, and may be forced out of business. At present, 1191 growers registered with Department of Floriculture (J&K) are active in commercial floriculture business generating an income of Rs. 19.42 crores (2023-24) which is under threat due to climate change.

The Kashmir’s temperate climate, fertile soil, and glacial waters have nurtured a flourishing floriculture industry with an area of about 431.25 ha alone under gardens, parks and lawns, attracting tourists all over world. Kashmir once celebrated as the “Garden of Eden” for its riot of colors and fragrances, isnow slowly turning into a battleground where nature and climate change are stuck in a grim struggle. Extreme weather events, like unseasonal frosts, irregular precipitation patterns, prolonged droughts and increased evaporation rates are becoming more frequent. One of the immediate consequences of climate change in Kashmir is the disruption of traditional weather cycles.

Blossom at Risk

The most significant impacts of climate change are the alteration of crop blooming cycles. A shorter blooming season, improper floral growth and colour development, and insufficient flowering are all problems associated with commercial flower cultivation, especially under open field conditions. Thus flower crops like tulip, marigold, gladiolus, annuals grown under open conditions will be greatly affected by these erratic weather changes. Among ornamental crops, flowering bulbs are considered as vital indicators of climate change due to their sensitivity to minor seasonal cues and temperature changes. Warmer temperatures are causing flowers to bloom earlier than usual, disrupting supply chains and affecting seasonal markets. Spring flowering bulbs viz., tulips, daffodils and crocuses are among the first plants to signal the onset of spring, have been observed blooming earlier than historical averages. Warmer winters have caused premature bud formation making them highly susceptible to unexpected frost. Ornamentals such as tulips, daffodils, magnolia, irises which need chilling temperature for flowering are adversely affected. Under present scenario of mild winter and warm spring, the bulb yield oftulip is expected to hit badly.  On the other hand, summers, with prolonged unexpected heat waves have also disruptedthe normal blooming process of flowers. These conditions lead to shortening of flower duration and deterioration of aesthetic and commercial value.

Temperature extremes not only influence the timing and quantity of flowering but also affect flower quality including volatile fragrances of flowers.  Temperature at low to medium range plays a critical role in pigment production especially anthocyanin which contributes to the vibrant colours of flowers.  The extreme temperature has also been linked to declining number of flowering buds and smaller flower diameters in species like Antirrhinum majus and Impatiens walleriana. Any unusual change in photoperiodism and thermoperiodism due to climate change would result in a significant deviation in the flowering patterns of plants such as carnations, chrysanthemums, and poinsettias.

The plant hardiness zones have also been observed to move northward or upwards in response to rising temperatures. Diversity of some alpine species has become vulnerable and their distribution is gradually narrowed. The rhododendrons and other woody ornamentals of lower hills have begun to invade the alpine areas thus changing the composition of plant population. Changes in the timing, duration, and abundance of flowering have the potential to disrupt ecological relationships among plants, pollinators, herbivores, flower parasites and pathogens.

Rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns and increased humidity create favourable conditions for outbreak of pests and diseases by expending habitat range that can cause damage to ornamental plants at high scale. This can pose a significant challenge to sustain quality production in floriculture, thus requiring integrated approaches to devise management strategies.

The plight of Kashmir’s floriculture is a microcosm of the global climate crisis. Despite the challenges, the floriculture industry has to adopt innovative approaches to combat climate change. Farmers can take up greenhouse cultivation to have better control of temperature and humidity and drought-resistant flower crops along with precision farming practices like drip irrigation etc. The modern approaches like roof and vertical gardening can play an important role in improving air quality, and reducing surface temperature in the built environment, costs for heating or cooling of building and noise pollution. Interior landscape plants are also useful to enhance indoor environmental quality and improve workplace efficiency. Development of public parks and lawns enriched with native flora improves air quality, mitigate health risk and maintain species diversity. The AI-powered systems can also be used to monitor and optimize the growing conditions of high value crops. Therefore, the future of Kashmir’s floriculture depends on collaborative efforts across all sectors. Policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders must join their hands to work together to execute policies and practices that promote sustainability and protection of the region’s floral heritage and tourism industry associated with it.

The authors are faculty at SKUAST-K’s Division of Floriculture and Landscape, Shalimar. zahoor.rthr@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

Ethical Consumerism And Organic Market Nexus

Published

on

Ethical Consumerism And Organic Market

Dr Binish Qadri

Malik Daniyal Shabir

The choices consumers make today are no longer limited to price and utility. Increasingly, purchasing decisions are being shaped by deeper concerns—about the environment, labour ethics, health, and long-term sustainability. This shift in consumer consciousness has brought ethical consumerism to the forefront of economic and social discussions. Ethical consumerism, at its core, is a form of activism. It transforms everyday market behaviour into a statement of values, where individuals engage with the marketplace not just as buyers, but as participants in shaping a more equitable and sustainable world.

One area where the impact of ethical consumerism is especially visible is the organic market. Organic food is not just about pesticide-free vegetables or hormone-free milk; it represents a broader commitment to a way of life that values nature, fairness, and health. The rise of the organic market is not merely a trend, but a response to a collective moral impulse—one that sees food as a gateway to better living for individuals and communities alike.

Ethical consumerism is not an entirely new phenomenon. It can be traced back to movements like boycotts of slave-produced sugar in the 18th century and, later, fair-trade campaigns in the 20th century. As globalisation expanded markets, it also exposed consumers to the darker side of production—sweatshops, deforestation, animal cruelty, and chemical abuse. Simultaneously, the organic farming movement took root, driven by concerns over synthetic fertilisers, pesticides, and declining soil health. What began as a fringe movement soon gained traction with the rise of environmental activism and public health awareness. In India, government recognition and consumer interest have boosted organic farming policies and local organic brands. Together, these developments forged a shared moral and ecological ground between ethical consumerism and the organic movement.

Organic food is not just about pesticide-free vegetables or hormone-free milk; it represents a broader commitment to a way of life that values nature, fairness, and health. The rise of the organic market is not merely a trend, but a response to a collective moral impulse—one that sees food as a gateway to better living for individuals and communities alike.

Health has long been a personal concern, but in recent years it has also taken on moral dimensions. The link between food choices and long-term well-being is clearer than ever, and consumers are beginning to view the act of buying food as an ethical choice. Rising rates of lifestyle diseases, antibiotic resistance, and food adulteration have forced many to question conventional agricultural systems. Organic food offers an alternative that aligns with both personal and societal health goals. Choosing food grown without harmful chemicals becomes not just a self-protective act but a gesture of solidarity toward a cleaner environment and a healthier community. In this light, the push for organic food becomes not merely a dietary decision but a reflection of a broader ethical framework.

There is a complementarity between ethical consumerism and the organic market. Both affect and get affected by each other. The consumption of organic food has moral considerations, such as health and social concerns including the environment and sustainability. Agricultural economics is witnessing a rising trend and craze for organic food, which is visible in the shift in the consumer taste and demand towards organic food. The mounting health issues among general population, especially among young folks are pressing hard for development of the organic market. Consumers are the king of the market who increasingly see organic food as a way to support eco-friendly or sustainable farming practices, safeguard the environment, and avoid chemicals linked to traditional farming.

As far as ethical consumers are concerned, they are often inspired by concerns about environmental impact, human rights, human freedom, and animal welfare, which coincides with the organic farming canons. In other words, they are bothered about the holistic socio-environmental and animal welfare outcomes of their purchasing power decisions. They give importance to the goods that are in accordance with their ethics and moral values, including environmental sustainability and objective labour activities. This contains refraining from goods from firms with a bad reputation or buying from firms displaying moral conduct right from scratch. They pay a pivotal role in promoting sustainable development, meeting needs of the present generation without compromising the needs of the future generations. They provide backup to ethical trade and commerce. They give top priority to companies with a great ethical background and sustainability principles, giving a clear-cut message that moral values are above all. Moreover, they stimulate demand for sustainable goods. They prefer fair-trade goods, organic food, and sustainable goods, and accordingly, create a demand for sustainable substitutes, promoting innovations (especially green innovation) and produce sustainable and green goods. The moment they do away with those companies that promote unethical and unsustainable practices, they basically drive a long path towards sustainable development. It has a dual effect: On one hand, it restricts child labour and immoral labour practices and on the another hand, it reduces environmental degradation. Furthermore, ethical consumers can promote environmental responsibility by raising awareness about social and environmental issues. They always prefer well-informed choices, thereby empowering consumers in every possible manner. By making informed choices, they be held personally responsible for their actions impact on the social systems and environment.

In states like Sikkim, which declared itself fully organic in 2016, consumer support and political will came together to build an ecosystem that values soil health, farmer welfare, and chemical-free produce. Farmer cooperatives and weekend organic markets in cities like Bengaluru, Pune, and Delhi have become popular precisely because they appeal to a consumer base that wants its spending to reflect its values. These cases show that ethical consumption is more than a concept—it is a living force with the power to transform how food is grown and consumed.

Across the globe and within India, the convergence of ethical values and organic preferences is reshaping markets. Brands like Organic India and 24 Mantra Organic owe much of their success to ethically conscious consumers who demand transparency, sustainability, and purity. In states like Sikkim, which declared itself fully organic in 2016, consumer support and political will came together to build an ecosystem that values soil health, farmer welfare, and chemical-free produce. Farmer cooperatives and weekend organic markets in cities like Bengaluru, Pune, and Delhi have become popular precisely because they appeal to a consumer base that wants its spending to reflect its values. In states like Sikkim, which declared itself fully organic in 2016, consumer support and political will came together to build an ecosystem that values soil health, farmer welfare, and chemical-free produce. Farmer cooperatives and weekend organic markets in cities like Bengaluru, Pune, and Delhi have become popular precisely because they appeal to a consumer base that wants its spending to reflect its values. These cases show that ethical consumption is more than a concept—it is a living force with the power to transform how food is grown and consumed.

While the growth of ethical consumerism and the organic market is promising, it is not without obstacles. One major challenge is greenwashing—where companies falsely advertise their products as ethical or organic, misleading well-meaning consumers. There is also a cost barrier: organic and ethically produced goods are often more expensive, making them inaccessible to a large section of the population. Certification standards vary, and not all organic products undergo rigorous verification, creating confusion and mistrust. Moreover, the effectiveness of ethical consumerism hinges on access to information. In many regions, consumers lack the knowledge or tools to make informed choices, limiting the reach of these movements. These challenges must be addressed to sustain momentum and ensure that ethical consumerism remains a genuine force for good.

The relationship between ethical consumerism and the organic market is not incidental—it is deeply rooted in shared values and mutual influence. Ethical consumers drive demand for organic products, while the organic market offers them a platform to express their values through everyday choices. Together, they form a powerful nexus capable of reshaping economies, societies, and ecosystems. To deepen this impact, there is a need for stronger regulations, better consumer education, and more inclusive pricing strategies. Only then can this movement become not just the preference of a few but a sustainable norm for the many.

Dr Binish Qadri  is former Assistant professor, Cluster University Srinagar and Malik Daniyal Shabir is an undergraduate student at the University of Delhi. They can be reached at qadribinish@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Editorial

SMHS incident: When hope turns to rage

Published

on

When hope turns to rage

The incident at SMHS Hospital, where an attendant assaulted a doctor after their patient reportedly died due to neglect, highlights a deeply troubling and complex issue within our healthcare system. While any act of violence is unequivocally unacceptable, this event serves as a stark reminder of the underlying frustrations and systemic failures that often lead to such desperate outbursts.
The core of the problem lies in the perceived lack of empathy and adequate care provided by medical professionals, particularly during critical situations. For doctors, dealing with illness and death may become a routine, a part of their daily professional lives. However, for a patient and their family, a critical illness is a life-altering, highly emotional, and often terrifying experience. The disconnect between these two realities is profound. When a patient, who has come to the hospital as a last resort, feels unheard, neglected, or that their loved one is not receiving the attention they desperately need, the sense of helplessness can quickly turn into anger and despair.
The situation in emergency wards across major city hospitals like SKIMS, SMHS, Bone & Joint, and Lal Ded is indeed dire. Overcrowding, coupled with a severe shortage of senior doctors and specialists, places an immense burden on the few junior doctors who are often left to manage a deluge of critical cases. This not only compromises the quality of care but also contributes to the stress and burnout among the medical staff, potentially leading to the very behaviour that patients and attendants find so distressing. Work pressure, long hours, and inadequate resources are often cited as reasons for a lack of bedside manner, but these reasons, while understandable to an extent, do not alleviate the suffering of those seeking help.
It is abundantly clear that a fundamental shift is desperately needed in how our hospitals, particularly emergency and critical care units, operate. The government must initiate a comprehensive re-evaluation and overhaul of the entire system. This overhaul is not merely a suggestion; it is an urgent imperative.

The core of the problem lies in the perceived lack of empathy and adequate care provided by medical professionals, particularly during critical situations. For doctors, dealing with illness and death may become a routine, a part of their daily professional lives. However, for a patient and their family, a critical illness is a life-altering, highly emotional, and often terrifying experience. The disconnect between these two realities is profound. When a patient, who has come to the hospital as a last resort, feels unheard, neglected, or that their loved one is not receiving the attention they desperately need, the sense of helplessness can quickly turn into anger and despair.

A significant increase in staffing is non-negotiable. We need more doctors, nurses, and support staff, especially in emergency departments, to ease the crushing workload and ensure that medical professionals can dedicate the necessary time and attention to each patient.
The constant presence of senior doctors and specialists in emergency and critical care units is paramount. Their invaluable experience and expertise are crucial for accurate diagnoses, timely interventions, and effective management of complex cases that junior doctors alone cannot always handle.
Furthermore, beyond medical proficiency, there is an urgent need for improved training in patient communication and empathy for all hospital staff. This includes equipping them with skills to convey information clearly, manage expectations compassionately, and demonstrate genuine concern, even amidst the most chaotic situations.
Addressing the pervasive overcrowding demands an upgrade in infrastructure and equitable resource allocation. This means more beds, modern equipment, and better-organised waiting areas. Resources must be strategically distributed to ensure that all necessary tools and medications are readily available when lives hang in the balance.
Establishing clear and accessible grievance redressal mechanisms is crucial. Patients and their attendants need effective channels to voice their concerns without fear. A robust system for addressing complaints proactively can prevent frustrations from escalating into unfortunate incidents like the one witnessed at SMHS.
Finally, while supporting our medical community, there must also be a culture of accountability. Instances of negligence and unprofessional conduct must be addressed appropriately to rebuild and maintain the vital trust between the medical fraternity and the public it serves.
The recent incident at SMHS Hospital is a symptom of a much larger systemic illness. It is a distress signal that demands immediate and comprehensive action. Patients come to hospitals with hope, seeking solace and healing. It is the government’s responsibility to ensure that this hope is met with professional care, empathy, and a system that prioritizes human life above all else. Failing to do so will only perpetuate a cycle of frustration, anger, and further erosion of public trust in our healthcare institutions.

Continue Reading

Trending